What Have Clubs Bought & Sold?

The transactions displayed were recorded by investment clubs during the month of September 2017 as reported by bivio. bivio.com is a favorite record-keeping solution for investment club accounting and has an admirable record of exemplary customer service and cost-effectiveness for many years.

I’ve been an advocate of bivio as an invaluable club resource since I first met one of the co-founders Dr. Ion Yadigaroglu nearly twenty years ago. The leadership was subsequently assumed by Rob Nagler and a solid tradition of delivering a quality solution and outstanding service is currently led by Laurie Frederiksen. It’s been a while since we did a club Dashboard Diagnostics session and it’s probably time to remedy that. If you or your club would be interested in a live portfolio review using our dashboards, let me know.

As many of you know, I was responsible for the annual portfolio contest at Better Investing magazine several years ago. This afforded me the opportunity to witness success as I reviewed hundreds if not thousands of club portfolios. The best practices and outcomes observed became the genesis of Manifest Investing.

Trust Your Stock Study Results

The bull market has been on rampage for several years. In fact, the performance since 2009 now resembles and reminds many of us of the late-1990s, a period that we often regard as a golden age of investing. Do you remember? The analysis and methodology deployed by most investment clubs involves using the business models, trends and forecasts to build a long-term expectation for the companies that we study. Good stewardship mandates that we continually monitor all of the important influences and characteristics for the stocks that we own. This is the hallmark and foundation of the modern investment club movement.

Sometimes after a persistent bull market, investors can hoist the patience and discipline anchor. “This form of stock analysis does not work any more?” “P/E ratios no longer matter.” (That’s true, but only for special situations and circumstances.) Do you remember? “P/E ratios don’t matter for Cisco Systems (CSCO) … it’s by far the most strongly recommended stock on the stock market.” “Ignore that sell zone. This bandwagon is leaving the station.” We know with 20/20 hindsight and the soon-to-follow 92% drop over 1-2 years that some bandwagons are more cruel than others. We also know that CSCO was squarely in the sell zone of most of our stock studies at the time with a long-term return forecast in the negative double digits.

Do you remember?

We’re human. That’s why anchors matter.

bivio Clubs Activity Report: The Long & Short Term Perspective. (October 7, 2017) Projected Annual Return (PAR): Long term return forecast based on fundamental analysis and five year time horizon. Quality Ranking: Percentile ranking of composite that includes financial strength, earnings stability and relative growth & profitability. bivio Clubs Net Buys vs. Sells: Number of reported purchases minus reported sales. The data is ranked (descending order) based on this criterion. VL Low Total Return (VLLTR): Low total return forecast based on 3-5 year price targets via Value Line Investment Survey. Morningstar P/FV: Ratio of current price to fundamentally-based fair value via www.morningstar.com S&P P/FV: Current price-to-fair value ratio via Standard & Poor’s. 1-Year ACE Outlook: Total return forecast based on analyst consensus estimates for 1-year target price combined with current yield. 1-Year S&P Outlook: 1-year total return forecast based on S&P 1-year price target.

Home Depot (HD): Business Model Analysis. The assumptions for Home Depot for a sales growth forecast of 5-7%, net profitability of 8-9% and a projected average P/E of 18x generate a return forecast in the mid-single digits.

The Bottom Line of any Stock Study is the Return Forecast

Home Depot (HD) is not Cisco Systems (CSCO). Home Depot is an exceptional company that dramatically weathered an industry DEPRESSION and not only survived but thrived. It ranks among the most widely-followed companies by subscribers at Manifest Investing and trust me, we’re grateful. But most of us would consider it a “Strong Hold” — not a “Buy” — under current conditions and based on the accompanying business model analysis.

Following a long bull market, some club participants begin to question the return forecasts of some of their favorite holdings. Some live in fear of the next bear market and urge colleagues to stick to blue chips and it doesn’t matter what the price or return forecast looks like. Many, many average investors flee to defensive blue chips and this has been going on for a long time as talking heads and pundits have been telling us to run for the hills for YEARS. The result of this is that many of our foundational favorite stocks are no longer attractive purchase candidates. Yes, quality matters. Quality is what keeps us safe when the next correction or bear market finally does arrive. Because it will. Nobody can tell you when. But, PRICE MATTERS TOO. Because return forecasts matter. Buying stocks with relatively low return forecasts will compromise your long-term returns and results.

For some context, we track approximately 2400 stocks at Manifest Investing. The average return forecast for those stocks (based on the collective results of a pile of stock studies) is now 6-7%.

Many of the companies at the top of the activity list have fairly weak long-term forecasts. We publish versions of this long-term and short-term perspective profile so that we can compare some trusted second opinions. In this case, note the general level of the low total return forecasts according to Value Line. We also check the price-to-fair value (P/FV) from Morningstar and S&P. A value less than 100% is regarded as potentially “on sale.” A value greater than 100% suggests that a stock is at least, temporarily, overvalued. Or expensive. Scan the list from top to bottom.

The lower return forecasts and expectations are generally at the top of the chart while the opposite is true at the bottom.

Home Depot (HD) is an example of a company that typically will reach a stock price plateau. Some of those plateaus have historically extended for many years. In many cases over the years, the stock price stagnates during an extended run where the business fundamentals steadily improve. This was the case for Home Depot a few years ago. I have no idea what lies ahead for Home Depot, it’s just that I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised by a plateau.

Which brings us to General Electric (GE) … the most heavily sold stock during September 2017.

In a game of word association — group therapy for GE shareholders — one of the most common words might be “fatigue.” GE shareholders are exhausted. How long can doldrums last? For this reason, and perhaps some tax-related selling at this time of year, we understand why an investor might feel compelled to sell GE.

But … as you complete your business model analysis, be sure to account for the dramatic changes in the structure of the company over the last few years. The General Electric of 2017 no where near resembles the General Electric of 2014. The financial component has been divested, a number of less profitable business units have been shed and the company on our screens is a different animal. Much of what they have retained and intend to strategically exploit are world class leaders in their enterprises. Take power generation and jet engines. World class. GE has added the remnants of Combustion Engineering and a number of water technology innovators to the mix. Their emphasis on deploying technology in the realm of healthcare continues to expand. GE has new executive leadership. Long story short — you can’t use much of the data array older than a year or two as you build a representative understanding of what the future may hold for GE.

Long story even shorter — our colleague Hugh McManus has been accumulating General Electric (GE) for the last few months as a participant in our monthly webcast series known as the Round Table. If you’re “selling” your shares, Hugh and his fellow knights and damsels are “buying” them. Hugh has a track record as a very successful stock picker and is notorious (and respected) for his long-term perspective. GE will be our featured stock this month.

Prudent Shopping & Good Things, “Small” Packages

We use consensus-driven individual stock analyses and dashboards to manage portfolios. Dashboards can also be used as a home for industry studies and pounce piles. In this case, we created a public dashboard for the stocks listed in this bivio activity report. You can access that dashboard here: bivio Clubs Activity: September 2017

Clicking on the PAR (Projected Annual Return) column header will sort the return forecasts from highest to lowest.

But this also comes with a caveat. Lists like these are almost always large company biased. This is because it’s a national/global compilation and the larger, more liquid, companies are just generally more likely to appear when they’re all “rolled up.”

One of the most critical aspects of building a successful long-term performance is to discover and prudently own some high-quality faster-growing companies. During September and October every year, we turn over leaves and hunt down promising needles in haystacks — the types of companies (think Bio-Reference Labs, Neogen, Masimo, Mesa Labs, Simulations Plus, Universal Display and a number of others) that bolster long-term returns. The search for promising smaller companies should never end and we intensify our efforts during the fourth quarter each year to — in some cases — take advantage of tax-related selling and the January Effect.

1. Check the rigging on your anchor.

2. Build and maintain expectations (do your homework) and use the results to guide your efforts. It’s what sets us apart from a herd of confused, weaker-performing participants known as “average investors.”

Don’t let your friends be average investors. Invest With Your Friends. Thanks, bivio!

Fave Five (9/29/2017)

Fave Five (9/29/2017)

Our Fave Five essentially represents a listing of stocks with favorable short term total return forecasts (1 year, according to Analyst Consensus Estimates, or ACE) combined with strong long-term return forecasts and good/excellent quality rankings. The median 1-year ACE total return forecast is 11.1%.

This week we return to the triple play screening method for our five favorites. The triple play possibility occurs when you find a stock that is very depressed in price and also appears to be on the verge of substantially boosting its profit margins. The triple play effect is possible in that:

(1) The depressed price of the stock can return to normal levels;

(2) increased profit margins can produce increased EPS and a higher price;

(3) may also cause higher P/E ratios, or P/E expansion.

The Fave Five This Week

  • Alliance Data Systems (ADS)
  • Coach (COH)
  • CVS Health (CVS)
  • General Electric (GE)
  • Ulta Beauty (ULTA)

The Long and Short of This Week’s Fave Five

The Long & Short. (September 29, 2017) Projected Annual Return (PAR): Long term return forecast based on fundamental analysis and five year time horizon. Quality Ranking: Percentile ranking of composite that includes financial strength, earnings stability and relative growth & profitability. VL Low Total Return (VLLTR): Low total return forecast based on 3-5 year price targets via Value Line Investment Survey. Morningstar P/FV: Ratio of current price to fundamentally-based fair value via www.morningstar.com S&P P/FV: Current price-to-fair value ratio via Standard & Poor’s. 1-Year ACE Outlook: Total return forecast based on analyst consensus estimates for 1-year target price combined with current yield. The data is ranked (descending order) based on this criterion. 1-Year S&P Outlook: 1-year total return forecast based on S&P 1-year price target.

Fave Five Legacy (Tracking Portfolio)

The rate of return for the tracking portfolio is 21.6% since inception.

The relative/excess return for the Fave Five tracking portfolio is +6.1% since inception.

Tracking Dashboard: https://www.manifestinvesting.com/dashboards/public/fave-five

Stericycle (SRCL)

Is Stericycle a Sell?

Stericycle (SRCL) was added to the Round Table tracking portfolio back in February 2014 at a stock price of $114.00. It has since lagged the market by some -21.5% (annualized) leaving some to wonder if it isn’t a sell candidate despite trading near 52-week lows.

Srcl analysis 20170920

The Value Line perspective — in a nutshell:

Our near-term investment outlook has grown more pessimistic over the past three months. Specifically, Stericycle is now ranked to under perform the broader market averages over the coming six to 12 months. The issue does hold wide recovery potential, assuming our long-term projections aren’t far off the mark. (Matthew E. Spencer, CFA August 25, 2017)

Perhaps, but trading near the 52-week low delivers a 1-year zoning position of 3.7% with a 1-year target price of $107. The “average stock” has a 1-year zoning position of approximately 80%.

As shown in the accompanying chart, SRCL is now “oversold” (RSI<30).

Srcl chart 20170920

Goldman Sachs has not changed their outlook from March — at least not in a public release or not yet.

This overview does display a spectrum of expectations for the 1-year target range.

Srcl analysts 20170920

Morningstar continues to maintain a fair value of $110.

This delivers a price-to-fair value of 70/110 = 63.6%

Growth: “These assumptions allow Stericycle to approach $4.5 billion in revenues by 2021, reflecting a five-year organic revenue CAGR of 3.7%.”

We expect the near term may yet be volatile as Stericycle continues to manage headwinds in its core business, integrate Shred-It, design and implement an enterprise wide information technology system, and ultimately restore confidence in a business that we continue to believe has the building blocks in place to produce reliable recurring revenue streams over the long run. (Barbara Noverini, August 10, 2017)

This Round Table perspective on Stericycle makes me question whether we should extend the -20% relative return selling criteria beyond one year.

Srcl rt relative return 20170920

Did we miss a “trough” in PAR — a potential selling opportunity when the stock price hit $151.6 during 2015?

How about quality degradation?

As the accompanying chronicle shows, the PAR did not reach “auto-sell” levels during 2015 — but this image does rekindle those questions about the notion of “support and resistance levels” on PAR charts also. For some stocks, should we be setting low-PAR and high-PAR triggers much like Bollinger bands in technical analysis? I don’t know. But it’s worth some considerations and a pile of case studies, I’d think.

Srcl chronicle 20170920

Bottom Line?
For current stakeholders, with the recent nudge upward in quality and the potential that the blending is going a little better, we think it prudent to hold through another earnings cycle and see if the “new company” can stabilize and move forward as suggested by the Value Line long-term outlook.

Be Careful Out There

This Week at MANIFEST (9/15/2017)

Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn. — Ben Franklin

Be careful out there. — Phil Esterhaus, Hill Street Blues

“Historically, September is the worst month for U.S. stock market performance,” wrote Minerd. “Since 1929, the S&P Composite Index has averaged -1.1 percent for September, making it one of only three months with negative average returns over that time. The worst performing single month over this time period was September 1931, when the S&P composite fell 30 percent.” — Scott Minerd, Guggenheim Partners

Call it the Pre-January Effect if you’d like. It’s particularly relevant and pertinent for the smaller, faster-growing companies this time of year. With the January Effect, we benefit from reallocation and tax-related selling by investing in smaller companies that have been unduly punished during the fourth quarter with the hopes that repurchase and first quarter purchasing will restore many of the damaged prices.

The key word is “unduly.” And in the words of George Nicholson (via the 1984 NAIC Investors Manual) and Hill Street Blues Sergeant of the morning watch, Phil Esterhaus, “Be careful out there.”

Nicholson’s stark warning appears on page 98 of the 1984 Manual.

The guidance is offered in the context of his “Challenge”, a switching consideration that is intended to improve the overall portfolio by selling a holding and replacing it with a suitable, bolstering, substitute.

“When you begin this Challenge, the most important rule is requiring that the challenger (or replacement stock) is of equal or higher quality.” [His emphasis added, NOT mine.]

The accompany chart of screening results is from the Value Line Investment Analyzer. As shown, the listing is sorted by Projected 3-5 Year Total Return (Descending.) Needless to say, these return forecasts are red hot.

We draw your attention to the Financial Strength column where many of the companies are C, C+, etc. Remember, a “C” rating from Value Line is equivalent to an “F” from your school days. The ratings don’t get any lower than “C”. You have to reach for at least a “B++” to get above average.

We also note that many of these companies have stock prices less than $10. It’s one piece of the puzzle, but worthy of a yellow flag and caution.

And finally, check out the growth column. There’s not a whole lot of growth here. In the words of David L. Babson, growth conveys “grace” to long-term investors often healing wounds and compensating for buying a good stock at a price where you should have waited. So there’s not a lot of grace in this group … either.

Turnout Terraforming

As a reminder, the monthly Round Table webcasts will continue and not be disrupted by these new Tuesday sessions.

That said, we’ve heard from a number of you that you’d be interested in seeing us tackle some subjects, topics and methods independent of the Round Table sessions. So we will.

Tuesday seems to be a fairly optimum time to schedule additional sessions although we’ll likely have a few “Turnouts” on other days of the week.

We’d like to hear from you. (markr@manifestinvesting.com) What’s on your mind? What topics would you like to see covered? Here are some that have been suggested or considered so far:

  • Getting Risk Right (Cy Lynch)
  • Lessons From The Legends (Hugh McManus)
  • How Can We Calculate Relative Return?
  • Are Quality and Moats Related?
  • What Should Our Investment Club Meetings Look Like?

MANIFEST 40 Updates

  • 9. Cisco Systems (CSCO)
  • 11. Walgreen (WBA)
  • 12. Qualcomm (QCOM)
  • 26. CVS Health (CVS)
  • 28. LKQ (LKQ)

Round Table Stocks

  • Cisco Systems (CSCO)
  • CVS Health (CVS)
  • Gentex (GNTX)
  • LCI Industries (LCII)
  • LKQ (LKQ)
  • Qualcomm (QCOM)

Round Table Sessions (Video Archives)

Best Small Companies

  • 14. Gentherm (THRM)

Results, Remarks & References

Companies of Interest: Value Line (9/15/2017)

The average Value Line low total return forecast for the companies in this week’s update batch is 5.6% vs. 3.7% for the Value Line 1700 ($VLE).

Materially Stronger: Estee Lauder (EL), Modine Manufacturing (MOD)

Materially Weaker: Acacia Communications (ACIA), Synaptics (SYNA), Qualcomm (QCOM), Rite Aid (RAD), Harmonic (HLIT), BT Group (BT), Genuine Parts (GPC), Walgreen (WBA), CenturyLink (CTL), Commscope (COMM), Avon Products (AVP), Pharmerica (PMC), Infinera (INFN), ATN International (ATNI), Dish Network (DISH)

Discontinued: NeuStar (NSR), Reynolds American (RAI)

Market Barometers

Value Line Low Total Return (VLLTR) Forecast. The long-term low total return forecast for the 1700 companies featured in the Value Line Investment Survey is 3.7%, an increase from 3.5% last week. For context, this indicator has ranged from low single digits (when stocks are generally overvalued) to approximately 20% when stocks are in the teeth of bear markets like 2008-2009.

Update Batch: Stocks to Study (9/15/2017)

The average return forecast (PAR) for this week’s update batch is 9.0%.

The Long & Short. (September 15, 2017) Projected Annual Return (PAR): Long term return forecast based on fundamental analysis and five year time horizon. Quality Ranking: Percentile ranking of composite that includes financial strength, earnings stability and relative growth & profitability. VL Low Total Return (VLLTR): Low total return forecast based on 3-5 year price targets via Value Line Investment Survey. Morningstar P/FV: Ratio of current price to fundamentally-based fair value via www.morningstar.com S&P P/FV: Current price-to-fair value ratio via Standard & Poor’s. 1-Year ACE Outlook: Total return forecast based on analyst consensus estimates for 1-year target price combined with current yield. 1-Year S&P Outlook: 1-year total return forecast based on S&P 1-year price target.

Fave Five (9/8/2017)

Fave Five (9/8/2017)

Our Fave Five essentially represents a listing of stocks with favorable short term total return forecasts (1 year, according to Analyst Consensus Estimates, or ACE) combined with strong long-term return forecasts and good/excellent quality rankings. The average 1-year ACE total return forecast is 10.6%.

Our Favorite Bubbles …

… just might be the kind of bubbles that evolve when we blend Ivory Soap with Irish Spring. Hugh McManus likes to shop for opportunities among stocks that are trading near their 52-week lows and for non-core case studies, he’ll sometimes demand that the stock prices be near multi-year lows. Part of the driver behind this is the recognition that there’s often a large difference between 52-week highs and 52-week lows, even for some of the bluer chip established stocks. Isolating opportunities to invest when stocks are in the lower part of those annual ranges would seem to provide a margin of safety and reduce some of the downside … and “all things created equal” why should we shop anywhere else. (Read that in an Irish brogue for full effect.)

The five stocks flagged this week are repeat selections for the Fave Five tracking portfolio and as the parade of second opinions shows — there’s largely some consensus about expectations. FleetCor (FLT), Starbucks (SBUX) and Ulta Beauty (ULTA) also popped up as high-quality stocks with relatively outsized return potential in Ken Kavula’s review of the Forbes Most Innovative Companies. Gentex (GNTX) has also been a Round Table favorite with stellar performance over the years and Akamai Technologies (AKAM) has been featured as a worthy exploration consistent with the growing need for cyber security.

StockSearch Results using the stock screener at www.manifestinvesting.com with the following criteria: Manifest Rank (percentile ranking based on combination of quality and long term return forecast) greater than 99.44% — or top 1/2 of top percentile of all stocks covered, Financial Strength > B++ (70%) and stocks within 20% of their 52-week low.

The Long and Short of This Week’s Fave Five

The Long & Short. (September 8, 2017) Projected Annual Return (PAR): Long term return forecast based on fundamental analysis and five year time horizon. Quality Ranking: Percentile ranking of composite that includes financial strength, earnings stability and relative growth & profitability. VL Low Total Return (VLLTR): Low total return forecast based on 3-5 year price targets via Value Line Investment Survey. Morningstar P/FV: Ratio of current price to fundamentally-based fair value via www.morningstar.com S&P P/FV: Current price-to-fair value ratio via Standard & Poor’s. 1-Year ACE Outlook: Total return forecast based on analyst consensus estimates for 1-year target price combined with current yield. The data is ranked (descending order) based on this criterion. 1-Year S&P Outlook: 1-year total return forecast based on S&P 1-year price target. 1-Yr GS: 1-year total return forecast based on most recent price target issued by Goldman Sachs.

Fave Five Legacy (Tracking Portfolio)

The relative/excess return for the Fave Five tracking portfolio is +2.3% since inception.

The absolute annualized rate of return is 15.3%.

Tracking Dashboard: https://www.manifestinvesting.com/dashboards/public/fave-five

Fave Five (8/25/2017)

Fave Five (8/25/2017)

Our Fave Five essentially represents a listing of stocks with favorable short term total return forecasts (1 year, according to Analyst Consensus Estimates, or ACE) combined with strong long-term return forecasts and good/excellent quality rankings. The average 1-year ACE total return forecast is 10.2%.

The Fave Five This Week

  • Akamai Technologies (AKAM)
  • Bank of the Internet (BOFI)
  • FleetCor (FLT)
  • Ulta Beauty (ULTA)
  • Western Gas Partners (WES)

The Long and Short of This Week’s Fave Five

The Long & Short. (August 25, 2017) Projected Annual Return (PAR): Long term return forecast based on fundamental analysis and five year time horizon. Quality Ranking: Percentile ranking of composite that includes financial strength, earnings stability and relative growth & profitability. VL Low Total Return (VLLTR): Low total return forecast based on 3-5 year price targets via Value Line Investment Survey. Morningstar P/FV: Ratio of current price to fundamentally-based fair value via www.morningstar.com S&P P/FV: Current price-to-fair value ratio via Standard & Poor’s. 1-Year ACE Outlook: Total return forecast based on analyst consensus estimates for 1-year target price combined with current yield. The data is ranked (descending order) based on this criterion. 1-Year S&P Outlook: 1-year total return forecast based on S&P 1-year price target. 1-Yr GS: 1-year total return forecast based on most recent price target issued by Goldman Sachs.

Fave Five Legacy (Tracking Portfolio)

The relative/excess return for the Fave Five tracking portfolio is +1.4% since inception.

The absolute annualized rate of return is 13.7%.

Tracking Dashboard: https://www.manifestinvesting.com/dashboards/public/fave-five

This Week at MANIFEST (8/25/2017)

This Week at MANIFEST (8/25/2017)

There is no science in this world like physics. Nothing comes close to the precision with which physics enables you to understand the world around you. It’s the laws of physics that allow us to say exactly what time the sun is going to rise. What time the eclipse is going to begin. What time the eclipse is going to end. — Neil deGrasse Tyson

Whenever I sing ‘Total Eclipse of the Heart,’ the way people sing along with me still excites me. It’s one of the songs that audiences know all the lyrics to, and they sing along with me, and it makes me so happy. People also know my songs ‘Holding out for a Hero’ and ‘Lost in France,’ and this gives me so much joy on stage. — Bonnie Tyler

Mark: Ken, You know what makes me sad?

Ken: What’s that, Mark?

Mark: When you and I take a road trip that takes us nearly within walking distance to Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania … and you’re unwilling to make a slight detour.

Ken: Friends, that “slight detour” would have added nearly two hours to a trip that would already require 9 hours. Besides, on both excursions, we were blasted with a deluge that probably drowned Punxsy Phil in all its fury.

Mark: Go ahead, big guy, make light of these tears. Besides, we know that Noah keeps the ark just south of Cincinnati.

Ken: Mark, you know what makes me happy?

Mark: You mean besides dinner with investing friends in Cleveland at Corky & Lenny’s?

Ken: Well, that too. But once again we discover a local conspiracy of investing educators who nurture excellence in long-term investing.

Mark: No kidding. We reviewed four investment club portfolios during the Keystone Strategies conference. All of them were well-positioned, adhering to design targets — most notable in that ALL OF THEM contained a sufficient number of faster-growing companies to keep the overall portfolio growth rate in the 10-12% range.

Ken: Folks, we don’t see this kind of thing very often — and it bodes well for the like-minded investors of Central Pennsylvania.

Mark: Absolutely. It reminded me of Cow Tipping in places like Beardstown and Faribault, Minnesota.

Ken: I can only imagine the detours involved there and I’m probably grateful that I wasn’t in the car. But go ahead, humor me.

Mark: And the wonderful achievements of the Broad Assets investment club of St. Louis. The River Oaks Investment Club has won the Keystone Strategies stock picking contest three out of the last four years in the group category.

Ken: I’ll give you that. The Keystone Strategies contest is outstanding and they’re to be commended. We recommend this type of activity as a path to learning, discovery, sharing of ideas and socializing with successful investors to all communities that we visit.

Mark: … which brings us to Neil deGrasse Tyson.

Ken: I feel a cosmic-sized detour coming on.

Mark: I think we can almost compare the behavior of the stock market in 2008-2009 to an eclipse. In hindsight, it didn’t really last that long but it was scary … but from an epic long-term perspective, we probably should have been looking at the Great Recession with a colander on our heads.

Ken: For some reason, I’m not having much trouble picturing you with …

Mark: [interrupting] I’m serious. Most of “Investor” Nation spends every waking moment worrying about price drops and whether or not it’s possible to time the market ad nauseam. This notion has been very destructive to so many as it has delivered pessimism-driven conservative approaches to asset allocation, etc. as the “gold standard” of prudent investing. For those with long time horizons — and a few more total solar eclipses in their future — there’s no need to think of price volatility as RISK.

Ken: In that case, I think you’re right. And we should point people to the work of our own Cy Lynch on the real definition and impact of RISK in our investing efforts.

Mark: Cy is right about this. And so is AAII’s James Cloonan. Fear of “Risk” has destroyed a lot of capital over the decades. And that leads me to another twisted perception that we’ve been jousting with for years. This turned out to be one of our favorite slides from the weekend.

Mark: [continuing] There’s a couple of things that we can see here. First, we counsel in a BIG way, the importance of all-of-the-above investing. We define this as a blend of fast-growing promising upstarts, a suitable dose of medium-sized workhorse companies growing near average growth rates and a dash of blue-chip stalwarts growing at low single-digit slower growth rates. We build and maintain our portfolios at a 10-12% average sales growth forecast for the portfolio. We can generally point to the Value Line Arithmetic Average as “beating” the S&P 500, largely because of the contribution of the small and medium components. However, this graph shows that the red hot S&P 500 has caught the Value Line 1700 of late, something we’ve not seen since the late 1990s and rarely over the last 60 years. Read Josh Brown’s Just Say No to the S&P 500 from this perspective. But beyond that, notice the roller coaster (volatility) of the S&P 500 versus the Value Line average. Which one is “riskier?” Take it a step further and remove the S&P 500 from the Value Line average (mentally) and imagine how much less bumpy (“riskier”) the remaining small- and medium-sized companies must be.

Ken: This puts our long-held perspective on full display. Fast-growing and medium-sized companies of suitably high quality do not have to be roller coasters. We might also observe our strong emphasis on the S&P 500 field of opportunity approximately five years ago.

Mark: Right. How ya like my colander now? We’ll take a closer look at the S&P 600 and S&P 400 in coming weeks, but we’re launching our Fast Growing Company safari season with a few of the companies we discovered among the entries for the Keystone Strategies contest portfolios. You know what makes me happy? Investing better, with friends, whether the sun is shining or when the moon gets in the way for a few minutes. I’m always holding out for a few more Heroes. (Certain apologies to Bonnie Tyler)

Ken: We visit a lot of chapters and investment clubs. And the efforts of Chuck Reinbrecht, Richard Lindsay and Bruce Kennedy are exemplary as well as the support and achievements we witnessed by the likes of Kyle Blevins, Donna & John Diercks, Ken Mobley, Mary Ann Rentsch and the Cleveland team, John Varner and Barbara Vinson.

Mark: We’re also grateful for the support provided by bivio’s Laurie Madison for the Keystone Strategies contest and event. We look forward to future visits to share ideas and thoughts with the investors of Cleveland and Central Pennsylvania. And that visit to Punxsy Phil’s neighborhood is still on my Bucket List.

MANIFEST 40 Updates

  • 10. FactSet Research (FDS)
  • 27. Starbucks (SBUX)
  • 29. Buffalo Wild Wings (BWLD)

Round Table Stocks

  • Buffalo Wild Wings (BWLD)
  • C.H. Robinson (CHRW)
  • Forward Air (FWRD)
  • Maximus (MMS)
  • McDonald’s (MCD)
  • Standard & Poor’s Global (SPGI)
  • Starbucks (SBUX)
  • Stericycle (SRCL)
  • Waste Connections (WCN)

Round Table Session Recordings Added

Best Small Companies

  • 3. Forward Air (FWRD)
  • 13. BJ’s Restaurants (BJRI)

Results, Remarks & References

Companies of Interest: Value Line (8/18/2017)

The average Value Line low total return forecast for the companies in this week’s update batch is 4.9% vs. 3.4% for the Value Line 1700 ($VLE).

Materially Stronger: Huron Consulting (HURN), Red Robin Gourmet (RRGB), Atlas Air (AAWW)

Materially Weaker: BJ’s Restaurants (BJRI), DineEquity (DIN), Bristow Group (BRS), Ship Finance (SFL), PotBelly (PBPB), Buffalo Wild Wings (BWLD), Waste Connections (WCN)

Discontinued: Panera Bread (PNRA)

Market Barometers

Value Line Low Total Return (VLLTR) Forecast. The long-term low total return forecast for the 1700 companies featured in the Value Line Investment Survey is 3.4%, an increase from 3.1% last week. For context, this indicator has ranged from low single digits (when stocks are generally overvalued) to approximately 20% when stocks are in the teeth of bear markets like 2008-2009.

Update Batch: Stocks to Study (8/25/2017)

The average return forecast (PAR) for this week’s update batch is 8.0%.

The Long & Short. (August 25, 2017) Projected Annual Return (PAR): Long term return forecast based on fundamental analysis and five year time horizon. Quality Ranking: Percentile ranking of composite that includes financial strength, earnings stability and relative growth & profitability. VL Low Total Return (VLLTR): Low total return forecast based on 3-5 year price targets via Value Line Investment Survey. Morningstar P/FV: Ratio of current price to fundamentally-based fair value via www.morningstar.com S&P P/FV: Current price-to-fair value ratio via Standard & Poor’s. 1-Year ACE Outlook: Total return forecast based on analyst consensus estimates for 1-year target price combined with current yield. 1-Year S&P Outlook: 1-year total return forecast based on S&P 1-year price target.

August Round Table August 22, 2017 at 8:30 PM ET ONLINE

Stocks Likely To Be Featured: TBD

This Round Table will continue the discussion on traditional selling analysis and explore the relative return-based selling we’ve suggested.

Consider joining Ken Kavula, Cy Lynch, Hugh McManus and Mark Robertson as they share their current favorite stock study ideas.

Registration: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/5621511966734158595

Coming attractions 20170821