Shopping, Dropping Your Wallet

Photo Credit: x-ray delta one (Creative Commons)

The American consumer has endured a relatively lengthy time when disposable income has been, in a word, weak. What impact would the following situation have? As you’re heading for the parking lot at work, they stop you at the gate. Before you can pile into your car, you must fork over 4% of your paycheck. It gets worse. You grumble as you drive away and pull into the parking lot at your favorite retailer. Now you’re greeted at the door and you discover there’s now a “cover charge.” That’s right. If you’re going in to spend $100, your new friend at the door will take $2-4, depending on how good of a mood they’re in.

Huh?

Science fiction? What’s next? A retinal scan a la Tom Cruise and another surcharge depending on a quick database search and your estimated net worth?

The payroll tax holiday is over. (Subject for another day but I don’t think we should do “payroll tax holidays”, ever.) Effective, January 27, merchants in 40 out of 50 states can assess a 2-4% surcharge for the privilege of using a credit card.

You can’t make this stuff up. But Issue 11 at Value Line, chock full of retailers, is probably as good as any time to talk about big pictures like aggregate consumption — and by definition, the relative health of the U.S. economy. As we chug through the updates this week, we notice things like the 3-5 year low price forecast for Coach (COH) dropping to $70 from $85. That may seem like a molehill, but the change in annualized total return forecast is a drop from 15% to 10%. We’ll certainly be taking a closer look at the collective opinion on Coach, from the consensus, Morningstar and S&P.

Share prices shares of companies like Macy’s, Target, J.C. Penney, and Best Buy performed horribly toward the end of 2012. As we slog through the updates, we’ll be watching for continued fundamental deterioration on a company-by-company and industry basis.

We’d call that five percentage point sag in the Value Line opinion material.

Some economists expect a few percentage point hit on GDP between tax increases, transaction cost offsets and the continued influence of deleveraging.

“Despite a deal to avert the fiscal cliff, consumer sentiment fell once again in early January, the University of Michigan’s index revealed on Friday. The decline, which follows a hard drop in December, was mainly caused by households with annual income below $75,000, as U.S. consumers face an estimated 4% contraction in disposable income because of tax increases in the first quarter. And it wasn’t just sentiment that dropped, as both the current conditions and the expectations indexes took a tumble in what can only be defined as a disappointing report.” — Forbes

Do you know what’s in your wallet? Come to think of it — do I even know where my wallet is?

What’s Your Wallet? (COH)

Photo Credit: dicharry (Creative Commons)

Coach (COH) certainly qualifies as a community favorite. Ranked #10 in the MANIFEST 40 collection of our most widely-followed stocks, a number of us are owners of this high-quality company.

In this week’s update for Value Line, the 3-5 year low price forecast has been adjusted from $85 (11/2/2012 company report) to $70 (2/1/2013). At a stock price of $51.21, this change alone drops the low total return forecast from 15-16% all the way to 10%. Now … 10% is nothing to sneeze at when the overall average low total return forecast is 7.7% — but that five percentage point punch to the midsection is well, a little breathtaking.

Sales Growth Forecast

Profitability Trend and Analysis

Projected Average P/E Ratio

Equity Analysis

Using a current (trailing 12-month) revenues of approximately $5 billion, a growth rate of 11%, net margin of 20% and a projected average P/E of 18x (payout ratio = 33% and projected yield = 1.9%) generates a long-term return forecast of approximately 18%.

The expectations of the analyst consensus, Morningstar and Standard & Poor’s are considerably more optimistic than Value Line — raising the overall average return forecast to a much higher level than 10%. It’s entirely possible that Value Line is one of the early arrivals and that we could see some weakness in the other forecasts, and we’ll stay vigilant — tuned for any material changes.

Value Line Low Total Return Screen (2/1/2013)

Based on a combination of fundamental and technical analysis, Rue21 (RUE) appears to be among the more attractive candidates for further study this week.

We’ll be taking a closer look at Aeropostale (ARO), Coach (COH), Deckers Outdoor (DECK) and Kohl’s (KSS) as they’re all current tracking portfolio selections or ranked fairly highly among our most widely-followed stocks by our subscribers.

Materially Stronger: Iconix (ICON), Foot Locker (FL), Christopher & Banks (CBK)

Materially Weaker: Aeropostale (ARO), Coach (COH), Bebe Stores (BEBE), Kohl’s (KSS), J.C. Penney (JCP), Big Lots (BIG), Crox (CROX), Deckers Outdoor (DECK)

Rue21 (RUE)

rue21 (RUE) was the 4th company in our annual stock selection countdown during late December 2012. RUE is a specialty retailer of private label apparel and accessories. The company offers an assortment of fashion merchandise at value prices, primarily catering to the teenage demographic. Products offered include graphic t-shirts, denim, dresses, belts, jewelry, handbags, footwear and intimate apparel.

The company was selected by Pittsburgh’s own Nick Stratigos during the February 2012 edition of our monthly Round Table. Nick is the reigning individual stock picking champion for our annual Groundhog Challenge and RUE has delivered a +3.4% relative return (vs. Wilshire 5000) since the time of selection.

With a sales growth forecast of 13%, net margin estimated at 4.9% and a projected average P/E of 18x, the return forecast is approximately 16%. RUE has a quality rating of 70.6 (Excellent). As shown here, the Value Line low total return forecast is 14%.

Pepsi (PEP)

Pepsi (PEP) showed up during this week’s Value Line update as one of the potential companies of interest — even if the return forecast was at the lower end of the featured stock spectrum.

At a Value Line low total return forecast of 13%, that actually compares quite favorably to the median Value Line low total return forecast of 7.9%. And now we trust, but verify.

Pepsi (PEP) is ranked #13 in the MANIFEST 40 (December 2012) with an excellent quality rating.

With a sales growth forecast of 5%, net margin of 11% and a projected average P/E of 18x, the projected annual return is 10% … a little less robust after conditioning the expectations by factoring in the opinions of S&P and Morningstar.

But 10% is still pretty good for this high-quality industry leader.

Speedometers and Forecasts

Photo Credit: myoldpostcards via Compfight (Creative Commons)

by Ted Brooks (Guest Author)

I’ve been watching the relentless climb of the market this past month. Almost every day, it’s notching another decent though not astounding gain. But, start adding them up, and before we know it, a pretty good-sized move is in gear.

Meanwhile, you’ve been monitoring the return forecasts gauged by MIPAR (our median return composite forecast based on approximately 2400 analyses of stocks, Manifest Investing Projected Annual Return), the Value Line Median Appreciation Projection (VLMAP) and in recent times — the Value Line low total return forecast (VLLTR.) You haven’t pressed the alarm yet, but you’re probably eyeballing the alarm button.

One thing I’ve learned is –- no tool is perfect. That includes MIPAR or the Value Line-based close cousins.

That being said – a relatively simple tool that works reliably in most circumstances is a very valuable tool. As far as overpriced vs. underpriced, I think MIPAR tends to “cut through the crap” and give a fast and fairly reliable look at the relative giddiness or gloom of the market. Granted, the inputs may get a little skewed from time to time, but I don’t have a better idea to suggest.

I got to thinking about this last night after – of all things – helping a guy diagnose some errant behavior in the speedometer in his ’56 Chevy. A couple other people chimed in, but their diagnoses were incorrect, because weren’t thinking about how it actually measures road speed. Because, the simple fact is – a speedometer doesn’t measure road speed.

You may find the MIPAR vs. speedometer analogy enlightening. Well, at least I did.

Prior to the introduction of electronically controlled speedometers in the 1980s, speedometer technology had been pretty much the same since at least the early 1920s (earlier ones varied slightly). Here’s how a mechanical speedometer on a rear wheel drive car (like the ’56 Chevy) works:

The output shaft of the car’s transmission turns the drive shaft, which turns the rear axle assembly, which turns the rear wheels. There’s 2 speedometer gears inside the transmission – one mounted on the output shaft, and another that meshes with it. The latter gear drives a flexible steel cable. This rotating cable goes to the speedometer.

Inside the speedometer are two concentric magnetized drums. A coiled return spring, much like the mainspring on a clock, is attached to the outer drum. The speedometer needle is also attached to the outer drum.

As the cable turns the inside drum, the magnetism between the drums overcomes the return spring. The outer drum moves slightly from its resting position – and in proportion to the speed of the cable. As the outer drum moves, the attached needle moves across the calibrated face of the speedometer, giving a reading of miles (or kilometers) per hour.

So, a speedometer does NOT measure the road speed of the car. It measures the rotation of the output shaft of the transmission. While this technique works well regardless of what gear the transmission is in, if you change the gear ratio in the rear axle or the diameter of the tires, the speedometer will no longer read accurately. You then have to change the ratio of the speedometer gears in the transmission to make it read correctly.

Then, there’s the actual speedometer mechanism that sits inside the car. Even if this mechanism is cleaned and lubricated, it still may not read correctly if the magnetism of the drums isn’t carefully matched to the return spring. There’s a special tool used to adjust the level of magnetism on the drums until you get a “pretty good” reading. This adjustment is done by trial and error.

So, you see – no how, no way does a speedometer measure the road speed of the car. It uses several levels of “proxy” to estimate it. Yet – for decades, people depended on this technology to know how fast they were driving.

Now, when I compare MIPAR as a measurement of market exuberance – be it the overall market, or on a given stock – I recognize it too is a proxy method of measurement. It too has things that could cause it to read incorrectly. But, when I compare it with the method used to measure road speed of a car, I think MIPAR is the more robust methodology.

Ted Brooks
Individual Investor

Investing Round Table (January 2013)

Photo Credit: h.koppdelaney (With Permission) cc

We’ll get together again on Tuesday night, January 29 at 8:30 PM ET to share and explore some long-term investing concepts and ideas. You’re invited to join us as Ken Kavula, Cy Lynch, Hugh McManus and Mark Robertson share their current favorite four stocks.

Why should you care? Because it’s part of a long-term demonstration of success. Ideas are shared and analysis methods discussed. Are these noble knights right all of the time? Of course not. But they’ve been sticking their necks out for years — it’s not always easy.

Chances are, you just might discover an idea worthy of further study and analysis …

As the following graphic shows, the collective performance of the selections made since July-2009 (Round Table since inception) have now outperformed the Wilshire 5000 by nearly two percentage points (yes, annualized, of course). That’s a performance level rarely achieved by “average investors” but frequently experienced by practitioners in our community based on the methods and principles of the modern investment club movement.

The +5% line is the overall long-term objective. The lower line (closer to -5%) is known as the DALBAR line and is representative of results achieved by “average investors” from 1992-2012. We also think of those levels as an example of a “Lynch Mob.” Peter Lynch has shared his frustrating, gut-wrenching, stories of personal friends who managed to experience LOSSES investing in Fidelity Magellan during a 15-year period when he achieved historical and rarely-matched +13% relative returns. This can only be achieved by performance-chasing (buying high and selling low) and Lynch anguished over watching some of his friends getting wrecked by their emotions and lack of discipline.

And yes, Virginia, most months we poll the Round Table audience and they vote on the ideas presented. To date, the collective performance of their wisdom-by-community selections is +5.0% per annum. There are times when more heads are better than one.

The Journey of Investing

Investing is a journey. And like a good vacation in paradise, it’s often done better and enjoyed more when we do it with friends.

We believe that the Round Table is one more iteration of an investment club, intended to share and explore the best ideas and practices.

We’re not bashful about channeling Jack Palance (and Billy Crystal) and others when we do this. In the past, we’ve shared thoughts on Sharing: Big, How to avoid ending up on the wrong end of spears … how patience can be genius in disguise … why we want to invest more like Spock and less like Kirk … how cow-tipping and muskrat pageantry link with prudent long-term investing … and more.

Do we talk about selling? Absolutely. In fact, Synaptics (SYNA) has been very good to the Round Table tracking portfolio — but will probably get raked over the selling coals on Tuesday night.

Stocks likely to be discussed: AeroVironment (AVAV), Body Central (BODY), Landauer (LDR), Microsoft (MSFT)

Program Note: As we do with many webcasts, we open up the “Green Room” and leave the floor open for questions, answers and socializing for up to 30 minutes before the official start of the program.

Session Archive (YouTube):  January 2013 Round Table

CNBC Stock Draft 2012: Photo Finish?

Photo Credit: Andreas Ebling via Compfight cc

Last year’s CNBC Stock Selection Draft may have started slow, but coming out of the turn and with one week to go — the race is heating up like, well … two billionaires brawling over a vitamin supplement company.

Not to be outdone by any Hollywood movie whether the horse be named Hidalgo, Seabiscuit or Secretariat … Joshua “Reformed Broker” Brown and his horse (RIMM) did their best imitation of a glue factory admission for most of the year as RIMM started excruciatingly slow but has passed the entire field in recent weeks and days. Cue the drama. Meanwhile, Reggie “No Glue Around Here” Middleton has been driving Google (GOOG) and serving up an unhealthy dose of dust for the field.

Only Josh and Reggie have managed to outperform the S&P 500 with their noble steeds. The highlighted entries show the selections and the other companies in the field were left on the cutting room floor at CNBC. (There’s little if any truth to the rumor that Cramer and Herb were still milling about, dishing out grief over the unchosen/ignored winners … except that Greenberg was notably grumpy about it)

The following provides the current value of $100 (each) invested in the field on 4/25/2012.

Coming down the stretch:

1. Brown (RIMM)
2. Middleton (GOOG)
3. Najerian (SBUX)
4. Altucher (AAPL)
5. Doolittle (DELL)
6. Hickey (JCP)
7. “Elmer” Adami (RSH)

Current dashboard: http://www.manifestinvesting.com/dashboards/public/cnbc-stockdraft-2012

Celebrating Heritage: Wall Street vs. Boondocks

Maybe it’s just the historian in me, but I think it can be very useful to go back and take a look at what we were exploring and talking about during October 2008.

Close your eyes. Remember the Bear Stearns meltdown? Merrill Lynch? Detroit was in the throes of another one of those generational 100-year floods known as automotive recessions.  The problem is that these now seem to happen every couple of decades or less. You could refinance your house with a signature over a fax machine. You could assume a mortgage several times larger than ever before and live in more house than you could ever really need … at the time. What could possibly go wrong?

Grab your favorite beverage and stoke up the fireplace. Read what was on our collective minds at the time.

Boondocks 4 years later 20130125

Maintaining Our Time-Honored Long-Term Perspective

I feel no shame, I’m proud of where I came from
I was born and raised in the boondocks

One thing I know, No matter where I go
I keep my heart and soul, In the boondocks …

It’s where I learned about [investin]’
Its where I learned about love
Its where I learned about working hard,
And having a little [edge] was just enough
It’s where I learned about Jesus
And knowin’ where I stand
You can take it or leave it
This is me. This is who I am.
Give me a tin roof, a front porch, and a gravel road
And that’s home to me, feels like home to me.

With certain apologies to the country band, Little Big Town, the last few weeks have presented an old-fashioned whumping of vast abuse to well-intended investors worldwide.

Part of Warren Buffett’s charm is that he hails from Omaha, Nebraska. In his words, it’s an advantage to be a thousand miles or so from lower Manhattan … in the boondocks so to speak. I believe it’s also been an advantage for legions of long-term investors that heed the wisdom and philosophies of George Nicholson and the modern investment club movement: EXPORTED FROM DETROIT.  What we do is Better Investing … yes, in the boondocks, with our focus on fundamentals, quality, excellence of management, building return forecast expectations and an effort to channel misguided emotion into the energy of opportunities.

Some Perspective: Halloween 2007

Lest we all forget, this agony actually started nearly one year ago. As Dan Hess observed, we’re now treated to 4-day and 4-hour bull and bear markets — marked by 20% swings in the major averages. The massive gains of Monday have already been eroded.

What’s going on?

We could do a full-hour version of Stephen Colbert’s Wag-of-My-Finger lambasting the guilty, but we’d run out of fingers before we ran out of hooligans.

Yes, the slowing economy, the housing bubble, irresponsible mortgage transactions (both ends), that oh-so-normal market paranoia and panic. But the core — at least to me — revolves around two main themes: (1) Greed and heinous liberties taken by “innovative” rhinos, and (2) the human condition that makes understanding cycles so challenging.

Volatility … It’s Hard to Call You a Friend, But We Must, We Must …

Make no mistake. This ain’t easy. It hurts to see balances in retirement accounts sag. Our Tin Cup model portfolio has gone from $450,000 to $620,000 and back to $481,700 in less than four days.

Very few stocks are immune from the symptoms. Equilibrium has been wrecked by the “innovative rhinos.” We’re seeing the effects of a MASSIVE breach of confidence and trust and it will take a while to restore equilibrium, independent of whatever flavor of recession we endure.

We hope you’ve enjoyed the contributions of Hugh McManus with respect to the banking challenges and opportunities whether he’s writing from the boondocks of Switzerland or California or any number of boondocks in between. Hugh and I have spent a fair bit of time trying to understand this “event” and we’ll probably take a closer look at Charles Morris’ Trillion-Dollar Meltdown in days ahead.

My take is that the credit default swaps (CDS) are literally a form of lottery ticket. The problem is that infinitesimal odds were in place … and redemption was never supposed to be an issue. We should know better. If the idiots responsible haven’t noticed that we’re having 100-year floods every 3-5 years now, they need some remedial math.

I still don’t understand how the “leverage thing” works when it comes to these lottery tickets, but I’m still working on it. It’s little different than if I wandered my neighborhood urging my neighbors to tear up their insurance policies. “I’ll cover your house for $100/month — no problem!” After knocking on (20) doors and collecting $2000/month in “premiums”, life is good. My favorite “innovative rhino” and I are going Maserati shopping together. Why worry? Not a single house has burned down in our neighborhood since we moved in over 10 years ago. No worries.

The disruption is massive and it hurts.

Our daughter is a teaching intern at a local high school. She came home with stories of how the educators are “bailing” on their 403(b) plans. Virtually every teacher has converted their holdings to “guaranteed income.”

But hope lives in the boondocks.

I’ve also received calls from several friends and family seeking investment opportunities. Our heritage keeps hope alive.

If fundamentals stay intact — and we’re stepping up our monitoring/updates of EPS results and forecasts, etc. — we see opportunity in the very shadows of a panic:

VLMAP (Value Line Median Appreciation Projection) has rarely ascended so rapidly. It’s now in places that beckon for the reverse gear on our investing trucks. But only if the long-term trends stay intact at levels to support the elevated return forecasts … we’ll be watching closely.

One More Time Around The Block in the Boondocks

History repeats. It simply does. And every time we go through things like this, we promise to learn from it and “do better next time.”

Next time is here.

At the risk of sounding like one of our presidential candidates, “My friends, we’ve been here before.”

As the accompanying chart shows, projected returns have soared to rarely-seen levels on a number of occasions in the past. If you’re a member of an investment club or individual investor who persisted in investing regularly, seeking the best companies at the best return expectations you know exactly where this is headed.

This 40-year profile of weekly VLMAP levels (the median projected annual price appreciation for the Value Line 1700 stocks) provides some interesting milestones:

1. 1974 Oil Embargo. Disruptions in oil supply, prices and waiting lines. Some of the best selections in the history of the Better Investing monthly Stock to Study were made during the mid-1970s.

2. Culmination of a really nasty recession. The start of the Reagan Expansion and approximate 20-year bull market — with speed bumps, of course.

3. Days of malaise. Better days were ahead. There are always better days ahead.

4. Desert Storm. Recessionary speed bump — advent to 10 of the best years investors have ever experienced.

We’re virtually certain to see this weekend’s VLMAP “lap” the field and move into either the #3 or #4 best investing time in the last 40 years. Note that the 2008 VLMAP peak is virtually even with the most promising days of late 1987.

… It’s All About a “Little” Edge

When Peter Lynch assumed the reins of Fidelity Magellan, his performance target was to beat the market by 2-3 percentage points. It doesn’t seem like much until you try it.

Here in the boondocks, we believe it’s prudent to aim for a five percentage point advantage relative to the overall market. Not everyone achieves the 5% advantage and George Nicholson “confessed” that he had no idea how aggressive this objective was at the time.

Solomon Select

The results of investing $100 into the Solomon Select featured stock each month since the inception of MANIFEST is shown in the accompanying figure:

The relative return for this tracking portfolio is a little more than 5 percentage points — versus matching investments in a total stock market index. The monthly selections have outperformed the total stock market benchmark with an accuracy rating of 59.1%. (The last time we checked, a typical accuracy rating for the CAPS stock picking experiment was on the order of 40%.)

Think of the voyage as a ship riding the cresting and bottoming waves. Our objective is to stay “above water” no matter how perfect the storm gets. (No George Clooney jokes, please.) Steadily maintaining this margin is one of the keys to successful long-term investing.

As Hugh shared earlier today, the measure of success isn’t necessarily the performance results versus any given benchmark — because achieving an 8% long-term return is vastly superior to stuffing Andy Rooney’s mattress .

A Clamor For Context

The average EPS growth rate for year-over-year results since 1970 has been 10%.

Problem is … average doesn’t happen very often. The annual results were 10% in 1979 and 1996.

Stock prices fluctuate. Return forecasts fluctuate. I hope nobody is surprised that EPS forecasts and results fluctuate. Historically, they fluctuate quite a bit. As the following figure shows, the range is pretty wide (-50% to +60%) and our EPS critter is pretty restless:

Truth is … the fluctuations have actually subsided in recent years.

The periods of recession according to the annointed economists who declare such things have been shaded. Note the EPS growth dips that generally accompany these recessionary periods.

Now take a look at our recent history and the projections for the next few years. There will be some differences due to sample and (I’m guessing) a large-company bias on the longer term Value Line results. How do the swings compare for recent years?

Right. Pretty steady, huh? This is the kind of stuff that snuffs memories and leads turnip-truck rhinos to declare that cycles have been repealed.

Those Cycles … They Can Beguile

I think one of the largest influences on the events of today is the reality that we have so little experience in dealing with economic/business cycles over the last 20 years. Look no further than the historical frequency of the gray highlighting (recessions) shown on that year-over-year EPS chart.

We used to get a whole lot more practice at these “things” called recessions.

Now, hands are a-wringing and the whining is saturated with adjectives that include things like Armageddon, holocaust and doomsday. Make no mistake, I certainly know that the pain is real but context, perceptions and perspectives have been assaulted. My family and I live at one of the epicenters … or should I say Ground Zero? … to pour on the emphasis? Many of our friends, family and neighbors work for either Chrysler, Ford or General Motors.

We started this conversation with blame distributed among (1) greedy rhinos and their opaque playground, and (2) the challenge of cycle recognition. Turns out the two are related …

In an interesting display of “leadership” that can only be framed as “Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid” , an automotive executive shared the following:

The times for the auto industry are not just unimaginable, but “truly unimaginable,” he wrote. And also “challenging,” he added three sentences later.

The current economic period is not just difficult, but “the most difficult any of us can remember.”

Truly unimaginable? Really? Somehow defense attorney Demi Moore in A Few Good Men comes to mind.

Demi: “I object!”

Judge: Over-ruled!

Demi: “Then I STRENUOUSLY object!!!”

The problem is … he’s wrong. (Or simply afflicted with short or very selective memory)

Check out the long-term track record for the sale of domestic light-duty vehicles over the last thirty years or so:

Breaking it down into year-over-year comparisons provides a better/closer look at the situation replete with a number of cycles and historical challenges:

By the way, those 2009 forecasts are deemed worst-case scenarios according to think tanks and economists in their research.

And 2008 probably isn’t even in the Top Ten Worst … yet.

The point is that we’ve clearly been here before. Granted, the specific aspects of the challenge are different but from the larger perspective, cycles have been cycles and will continue to be cycles for the forseeable and unforseeable future.

There are cases where our analysis would be well-served to include much more than 10 years of retrospective. It’s something we’ll be taking a much closer look at because we believe that cycles will be cycles … and they deliver beguiling challenges.

When The Music Stops … Will You ‘Own’ A Chair?

Dan Hess is right about yesterday’s market surge. And frankly, it’s precisely one of the things I consider the most dangerous about these times that we live in. We all remember the childhood game of musical chairs.

Our daughter, newly-minted degree from Michigan State in hand, is a teaching intern at a local high school. As the latest episode of market turbulence has erupted, she’s shared stories of teachers seeking refuge in their 403(b) plans by converting their equity-based holdings to cash or “guaranteed return” options.

The music will stop.

As Warren Buffett has shared in his op-ed a couple of weeks ago, no one — not even the Oracle of Omaha himself — can say when, where and how much … but the music will stop.

Here’s a look at a one-day chart of market performance. Again, I emphasize that this one day would have been representative of greater than 50% of most market * years * of stock market heritage.

String several days like this together and SUDDENLY an entire wing of gifted, but fugitive, educators (and a nation of “average” investors) has been left in a chilling wake of forfeited opportunity.

Follow the Money

We’ve been hearing a lot about “huge piles of cash” on the sidelines and in doing some homework, I’ve discovered an area ripe for even more confusion. When we look at the cash levels in the average equity funds, it’s running about 4.5% at the present. This ranges from 2-10% (approximately) over the years. Many pundits are looking at these cash levels and suggesting, “it’s not that high.”

These levels are driven/influenced by: (1) relative interest rate levels, and (2) redemption activity. With low interest rates and fund managers struggling to cover redemptions, I’m not surprised at all that the level is so “low.”

When we make a comparison of cash accounts versus total assets, the picture changes considerably:

Source: SeekingAlpha: Cash Levels & Signals of a Market Bottom

Study this closely. This is what the gasoline for the engine called “Sudden” looks like. Much has been made that some of these intra-day major moves in the market have been on low trading volume. Many of the rhinos are sleeping or treading water. They never sleep for ever.

The current cash/assets ratio is approximately 32%. [Source: www.ici.org]

None of us know what the bottom looks like or if we’re any where near it. But history teaches us about the chilling wake. Ken Fisher recently shared during a Bloomberg interview that every time he hears, “But … it’s different this time …” he immediately begins shopping for high-quality companies for the long haul.

Historically, investors have increased cash positions during bear markets but have been slow to reallocate to stocks. Sudden corrections — and sudden rallies — have been a normal part of the stock market over time, and attempting to move in and out of it can be a costly endeavor.

Our family is steadily committing cash positions in our retirement accounts to the likes of companies featured here perpetually at Manifest Investing. We believe in the long-term perspective for world class companies — no matter where they’re domiciled. We believe in the resilience of the American people, our leadership companies, and the dogged nature with which we’ve always tackled the challenges that confront us. We may not know a market bottom when we see it, but we know what avoiding the lure of musical chairs has meant for hundreds of thousands of effective long-term investors over several decades.

… knowin’ where I stand
You can take it or leave it
This is me. This is who I am.
Give me a tin roof, a front porch, and a gravel road
And that’s home to me, feels like home to me.

Thanks for listening. 🙂

Shop and study at will.

Mark Robertson